Medicine
Eight Reasons Why the Future of Personalized Medicine will involve 3D-Printed Pharmaceuticals
While I started talking about 3D pill printers nearly ten years ago, today we are seeing incredible breakthroughs in personalized medicine emerging along two fronts:
- Diagnostic Breakthroughs, for example, with genetic, DNA, and molecular testing to uncover possible health threats, suggest optimal treatment pathways, and determine if further specialized tests are needed.
- Intervention Breakthroughs to customize care to the patient and yield a patient-based rather than a one-size-fits-all disease-based treatment protocol.
One of the most exciting and promising developments on the intervention side is the development of 3D-printed (additive manufacturing) pharmaceuticals. The promise for these products lies not only in the conventional manufacturing process but in the possibility of customizing the drugs in areas like dosage and release timing.
The pharmaceutical industry has come a long way from the days of crudely formulated drugs and doctors who basically guess what dosages are right for their patients.
If a particular pharmaceutical comes in the form of a 200 mg pill, doctors will prescribe 200, 400, or 600 mg doses when the right dose for an individual may be 87 mg, 341 mg, or 496 mg. With 3D printing, doctors can be far more precise.
Also, if the patient doesn’t tolerate an important drug well, doctors will have the option of customizing the pill, so the ingredients are released over an extended period of time.
Where We Stand Now
The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has already approved the 3D printing of one drug, Aprecia Pharmaceutical’s Spritam, an anticonvulsant medication used for the treatment of seizures. With that approval, industry leaders see the floodgates opening. As 3D printing technology evolves and production costs come down, any pill or capsule that we swallow is now a candidate for this process and this kind of customization.
The FDA has also given preliminary approval to Eli Lilly to partner with Triastek, a Chinese pharmaceutical additive manufacturing company, to explore delivery mechanisms for two of its new medications. The two companies are investigating printed pill shapes and other excipient (non-medicinal) properties that promote the programmed or timed release of the drug’s active ingredients.
In addition to Aprecia and Eli Lilly, three other drug companies, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and FabRx, are also actively pushing into this market.
Globally, the market for 3D-printed drugs is predicted to grow by 15% over the next six years, reaching more than $2 billion by 2027.
We’re on the verge of a 3D-printed pharmaceutical industry where precisely measured doses are easy to create and where multiple drugs in varying doses can be combined into a single pill. Flavors and colors will be customized as well.
Eight Advantages of Printed Pharmaceuticals
Personalized health care is clearly one of the primary benefits of 3D-printed oral medications. But I see at least eight additional reasons this technology will be a game changer.
1. Specialized Drugs
It will enable small-batch printing of specialty drugs for rare or “orphan” diseases, the kind of drugs that pharmaceutical companies tend to sidestep due to low volume and profitability. The technology will also be the ideal way to produce small quantities of drugs for clinical trials in which variable doses need to be tested.
2. Reduced Inventory
Hospitals will be able to print specialized and personalized drugs onsite, reducing the need for stockpiling and providing nearly immediate access to specialty drugs they may not have on hand.
3. Local Production Advantages
In addition to hospitals, pharmacies will be in a position to print prescribed drugs for their customers. The distribution process for many drugs will be shortened as we bypass drug wholesalers for many specialized drugs.
4. Shorter Supply Chain
Locally produced 3D-printed drugs won’t be subject to supply chain constraints. Today, many of our drugs are formulated overseas and then packaged there. That equates to a lot of shipping and quality control steps.
5. Workarounds for Disruptions
If a drug manufacturer needs to temporarily close its facility for any reason, 3D printing can fill the supply gap.
6. Improved Drug Safety
Aspects of drug safety can be improved with local production since there will be less opportunity for counterfeit drugs to be introduced into the distribution process. Costs related to maintaining the required documented pedigree of the drug will be reduced as well.
7. Efficient Use of Raw Materials
3D printing of any item, whether it’s a house, pair of shoes, or a pharmaceutical drug, makes far more efficient use of the raw materials involved. Less waste in drug production means far better use of valuable chemical ingredients.
8. Reduced Cost to End User
Most of these benefits – including the shorter distribution chain, reduced expenses for tracking drug pedigrees, less production waste, and localized production – along with continued advances in 3D printing technology, has the potential to significantly reduce the cost of drugs for the end user.
Barriers We Still Need to Overcome with 3D-Printed Drugs
Even though I just painted a rather promising future for this industry, we’ll still need to resolve certain challenges that will come with widespread 3D drug printing.
- Bad Actors
As with any technological breakthrough, we’ll need to anticipate how 3D drug printing could be abused by bad actors. The technology will enable drug dealers to manufacture illicit narcotics and it could empower counterfeiters to print fake drugs without active ingredients or with the wrong/dangerous ingredients. - Revised Regulatory Processes
We’ll need to revise our drug manufacturing regulatory process, shifting to approving multiple local production sites rather than primary manufacturing plants. The FDA will also need to address matters related to personalized dosing and release profiles. That means regulators will have to focus on additive manufacturing equipment, processes, and quality assurance of the printing ingredients – not a small shift for this large bureaucracy. To their credit, though, the FDA is already working with the National Institute of Standards and Technology to develop guidelines for 3D drug production. - Industry Disruptions
The pharmaceutical manufacturing industry will likely raise regulatory and legal barriers to this widespread practice since it threatens the industry’s markups and monopolies. Some will shift to becoming suppliers of chemical ingredients rather than manufacturers of finished pills and capsules.
Over time, we’ll overcome these hurdles so that the benefits of customized, 3D-printed pharmaceuticals will be available for everyone. The FDA will reach a tipping point so that approvals for these processes and products will become more routine while remaining thorough.
And as we add more and more sensors to our bodies, the linkage between personalized diagnostics and personalized pharmacological treatment will become even closer and … well… even more personalized.
By Futurist Thomas Frey
Author of “Epiphany Z – 8 Radical Visions for Transforming Your Future”
Features Archive
- Green Energy
- Climate Change III
- Climate Change II
- Farming II
- Farming
- Banking VI
- Banking V
- Banking IV
- Politics III
- Politics II
- Politics
- AI Ethics IV
- AI Ethics III
- AI Ethics II
- AI Ethics
- Waste III
- Medicine
- Water IV
- Water III
- Creativity
- Solar Energy II
- Solar Energy
- Fashion
- Fashion II
- Humans IV
- Humans III
- Humans II
- Humans
- Money V
- Money IV
- Money III
- Money II
- Money
- Urban Futures II
- Urban Futures
- Ageing II
- Ageing
- Space IV
- Space III
- Space II
- Space
- Governments
- Metaverse IV
- Metaverse III
- Metaverse II
- Metaverse
- Technology III
- Technology IV
- Technology II
- Privacy III
- Privacy II
- Privacy
- Meat IV
- Meat III
- Meat II
- Meat
- Housing III
- Housing II
- Housing
- Retail
- Insurance
- Logistics II
- Logistics
- Mobile II
- Security III
- Security II
- Language II
- Tourism Post-Covid-19
- Entertainment Post-Covid-19 II
- Entertainment Post-Covid-19
- Cities Post-Covid-19
- Work Post-Covid-19 III
- Work Post-Covid-19 II
- Work Post-Covid-19
- Post-Covid-19 Economy II
- Post-Covid-19 Economy
- Education Post-Covid-19 II
- Education Post-Covid-19
- Post-Covid-19 V
- Post-Covid-19 IV
- Post-Covid-19 III
- Post-Covid-19 II
- Post-Covid-19
- Pandemics V
- Pandemics IV
- Pandemics III
- Pandemics II
- Pandemics
- Food II
- Food
- Futures V
- Futures IV
- Cars V
- Cars IV
- Cars III
- Cars II
- Cars
- Futures III
- Futures II
- Futures
- Education XI
- Education X
- Education IX
- Cities VI
- Cities V
- Cities IV
- AfriCities VIII
- AfriCities VII
- AfriCities VI
- AfriCities V
- AfriCities IV
- AfriCities III
- AfriCities II
- Youth II
- Migrants II
- Foresight IV
- Foresight III
- Higher Education VII
- Agriculture VII
- Work III
- Work/Women
- Cities III
- Carbon Tax
- Higher Education VI
- Higher Education V
- Higher Education IV
- Higher Education III
- Higher Education II
- Higher Education
- Banking III
- Banking II
- Banking
- Humanity VII
- Humanity VI
- Humanity V
- Humanity IV
- Humanity III
- Women V
- Digitalisation of Informal sector
- Islamic Economy
- Drones VII
- Drones VI
- Drones V
- Drones IV
- Drones III
- Drones II
- Drones
- Digital Health III
- Digital Health II
- Digital Health
- Transport IV
- Transport III
- Transport II
- Transport
- Infrastructure V
- Infrastructure IV
- Infrastructure III
- Crime V
- Crime IV
- Crime III
- Crime II
- Crime
- Agriculture VI
- Agriculture V
- Agriculture IV
- Agriculture III
- Agriculture II
- Women IV
- Women III
- Women II
- Women
- Humanity II
- Humanity
- Artificial Intelligence V
- Artificial Intelligence IV
- Artificial Intelligence III
- Universal Basic Income
- Alternative Economies V
- Alternative Economies IV
- Foresight II
- Alternative Economies III
- Additive manufacturing
- Artificial Intelligence II
- AI Risk, Ethics & Regulation
- Waste II
- Mining II
- African Futures IV
- Education VIII
- Justice
- Libraries III
- Libraries II
- Libraries
- Education VII
- Education VI
- Education V
- Green Energy II
- Financial Systems III
- Education IV
- Alternative Economies II
- Research
- Education III
- Artificial Intelligence
- Economic Integration II
- Health Inequity
- Invisible Economy
- Future Thinking
- Pan Africanism VII
- Infrastructure
- Financial Systems
- Sustainability III
- Sustainability II
- Alternative Economies
- Water II
- Mega Trends 2015, 2010s, 2100s?
- AfriCities
- Energy
- Sustainability
- Families
- Prisons II
- Prisons
- Work II
- Work
- Health II
- Pan-Africanism VI
- African Futures III
- African Futures II
- African Futures
- Economic Integration
- Climate Action III
- Manufacturing
- Green Economy
- Climate Action II
- Climate Action
- Foresight
- Ethnicity & Tribalism
- Pan-Africanism V
- Youth Policy II
- Gender Equality II
- Gender Equality
- Youth Policy
- Migrants
- Waste
- Pan-Africanism IV
- Pan-Africanism III - East Africa
- Pan-Africanism II
- Pan-Africanism
- Philanthropy
- Renewable Energy III
- Renewable Energy II
- Renewable Energy
- Informal Cities III
- Informal Cities II
- Informal Cities
- Human Development
- Security
- Global Engaged Citizens - Upskilling for Post Growth Futures, Together
- System Thinking - Systems thinking and courage
- Thrivability II - New Movements
- Thrivability - Bottom Line to Full Circle
- Youth Unemployment
- Food Insecurity II
- Food Insecurity
- Language
- Globesity
- Kenya II
- Kenya
- Mining
- Infrastructure II
- Women & Poverty II
- Women & Poverty
- Cities II
- Cities
- Innovation
- Climate Change
- Agriculture
- Books
- Youth
- Mobile
- Regional Integration IV
- Regional Integration III
- Regional Integration II
- Regional Integration
- Fresh Water
- Education II
- Health
- Education
- Leisure
- Urban Poor
- Economy
- Peace
- Women
- Technology
- Environmental
- Democracy
- The brief called for a blog
- Post-oil
- Game Changers